<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Five Sketches™ &#187; competitor benchmarking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fivesketches.com/tag/competitor-benchmarking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fivesketches.com</link>
	<description>Ideation, design, and usability for development teams</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 04:24:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Blended usability approach &#8220;best&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://fivesketches.com/2008/04/blended-usability-approach-best/</link>
		<comments>http://fivesketches.com/2008/04/blended-usability-approach-best/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeromeR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design, process, business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competitor benchmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heuristics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivesketches.com/?p=976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received a brochure in the mail, titled Time for a Tune-up: How improving usability can improve the fortunes of your web site. It recommends this blend of usability methods:

Expert reviews focus on workflows and give best results when the scope is clearly defined.
Usability studies are more time-consuming than expert reviews, but is the best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received a brochure in the mail, titled <em>Time for a Tune-up: How improving usability can improve the fortunes of your web site</em>. It recommends this blend of usability methods:</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #555555;"><strong><img style="float: right;" src="http://fivesketches.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/usability-mix.png" alt="A blended approach" width="207" height="124" />Expert reviews</strong></span> focus on workflows and give best results when the scope is clearly defined.</li>
<li><span style="color: #555555;"><strong>Usability studies</strong></span> are more time-consuming than expert reviews, but is the best way to uncover real issues.</li>
<li><span style="color: #555555;"><strong>Competitor benchmarking</strong></span> looks at the wider context.</li>
</ul>
<p>The brochure is written by online-marketing consultants, and with Web sites in mind, but its content is also relevant to other development activities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fivesketches.com/2008/04/blended-usability-approach-best/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

